This is a small essay on what Isaac Asimov thinks intelligence is. I got it as a forward from one of my cousins and the essay is attributed to the famous scientist and author. If there is one essay that clearly highlights the point of academic excellence not being an indicator for innate intelligence, it is this essay.
To all those students and friends who get dispirited with their inability to score good marks and who consequently think themselves to be dullards, I do hope you will read this and derive your own inspiration. No man was made to be a dullard. We are all the crown jewel of God’s creation with the best of intelligence and wisdom. It is just hidden in layers of our own fears and pre-conceived notions.
Read on…..
What Is Intelligence, Anyway?
By Isaac Asimov
What is intelligence, anyway? When I was in the army, I received the kind of aptitude test that all soldiers took and, against a normal of 100, scored 160. No one at the base had ever seen a figure like that, and for two hours they made a big fuss over me. (It didn’t mean anything. The next day I was still a buck private with KP – kitchen police – as my highest duty.)
All my life I’ve been registering scores like that, so that I have the complacent feeling that I’m highly intelligent, and I expect other people to think so too. Actually, though, don’t such scores simply mean that I am very good at answering the type of academic questions that are considered worthy of answers by people who make up the intelligence tests – people with intellectual bents similar to mine?
For instance, I had an auto-repair man once, who, on these intelligence tests, could not possibly have scored more than 80, by my estimate. I always took it for granted that I was far more intelligent than he was. Yet, when anything went wrong with my car I hastened to him with it, watched him anxiously as he explored its vitals, and listened to his pronouncements as though they were divine oracles – and he always fixed my car.
Well, then, suppose my auto-repair man devised questions for an intelligence test. Or suppose a carpenter did, or a farmer, or, indeed, almost anyone but an academician. By every one of those tests, I’d prove myself a moron, and I’d be a moron, too. In a world where I could not use my academic training and my verbal talents but had to do something intricate or hard, working with my hands, I would do poorly.
My intelligence, then, is not absolute but is a function of the society I live in and of the fact that a small subsection of that society has managed to foist itself on the rest as an arbiter of such matters.
Consider my auto-repair man, again. He had a habit of telling me jokes whenever he saw me. One time he raised his head from under the automobile hood to say: “Doc, a deaf-and-mute guy went into a hardware store to ask for some nails. He put two fingers together on the counter and made hammering motions with the other hand.
“The clerk brought him a hammer. He shook his head and pointed to the two fingers he was hammering. The clerk brought him nails. He picked out the sizes he wanted, and left. Well, doc, the next guy who came in was a blind man. He wanted scissors. How do you suppose he asked for them?”
Indulgently, I lifted by right hand and made scissoring motions with my first two fingers. Whereupon my auto-repair man laughed raucously and said, “Why, you dumb jerk, He used his voice and asked for them.”
Then he said smugly, “I’ve been trying that on all my customers today.” “Did you catch many?” I asked. “Quite a few,” he said, “but I knew for sure I’d catch you.” “Why is that?” I asked. “Because you’re so god damned educated, doc, I knew you couldn’t be very smart.”
May 31, 2010 at 5:20 pm
Guffawed!
May 31, 2010 at 11:59 pm
i don’t own a car. but when i do, and when i need to visit the repair man, i will never quote my academic certificates.
June 1, 2010 at 3:16 pm
Woderful sir…thats the irony of necessary evil!
June 1, 2010 at 4:19 pm
Another Anecdote: (JC sent this to the Sai Sannidhi group this morning)
The late Richard Feynman of the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) co-winner of the 1965 Nobel Prize in physics was much more than a great scientist and a superlative teacher. Caltech graduate Marcus Chown recalls:
“The BBC once screened a profile of Feynman in its ‘Horizon’ series. My mother, who had never shown interest in any science program, watched it from beginning to end. I had an idea. I would go to Feynman, explain that my mother had watched him on TV, and ask him to drop her a note. Then when I tried to explain why the earth is round or the sky is blue, she might be receptive ! ”
Feynman did write to my mother:
“Dear Mrs Chown-Ignore your son’s attempts to teach you physics. Physics isn’t the most important thing. LOVE IS.
Best Wishes,
Richard Feynman”
June 2, 2010 at 7:01 am
Very funny and very apt too! Thanks for sharing it.
June 4, 2010 at 11:17 am
Great quote. Never knew this. Goes on to prove that, unlike common opinion, the so-called not-very-sociable-coz-they-are-intellectuals/scientists folks often turn out to have some real understanding of philosophy, spirituality and life in general.
January 3, 2011 at 12:32 am
Brilliant!!!!